Thursday, August 30, 2012

Immigrants aren't a unified voting bloc


    
                                Jack Doppelt
Aug. 30, 2012

[A version of this article was published as The Complex Picture of America’s New Immigrants on the Juvenile Justice Information Exchange (JJIE)]

With President Barack Obama’s mid-June directive that protected certain children of illegal immigrants from deportation, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that invalidated most of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law, immigration has finally been yanked onto the front burner. 

With that spotlight has come some misleading shorthand: that immigrant means Latinos and illegal, and that legal immigrants, including immigrant youth, if mobilized to become citizens will vote Democratic. Immigration in the United States today is far more comprehensive than stereotypes and myths can convey, and we owe it to ourselves to understand the nuance of the politics and influence on our country, especially in an election year. 

There are about 40 million immigrants in the United States today, and according to the U.S. Census Bureau, that is more than at any time in U.S. history. Almost two-thirds have arrived during the past 20 years. Immigrants, defined as people born outside the United States and residing here legally or illegally, now comprise about one-eighth or 12.5% of the U.S. population. 

According to Census figures, 11 million of today’s U.S. immigrants were born in Mexico, another 10 million originate from other Latin American countries and the Caribbean. Some 11 million are Asian, primarily from China, India, Philippines, Vietnam and Korea. Five million of today’s U.S. immigrant population originates from Europe, including the former Soviet Union. 

More than half of U.S. immigrants today are between the ages of 18 and 44. They are seldom accounted for in political polling in the run-up to an election, though more than 40 percent of all immigrants are citizens and entitled to vote, according to 2010 U.S. Census Bureau data. 

In a series, “Immigrants don’t fall in line for 2012 elections,” published by Immigrant Connect, an online network for immigrants, refugees, their families and communities in partnership with 12 ethnic media outlets in Chicago, we examined how different immigrant communities are approaching the 2012 election campaigns. 

Among what we discovered are stories of traditionally Democratic strongholds veering away from supporting President Obama – in the Indian community that has become wealthier and a natural reservoir for political fundraising; among Poles who face a quandary between an opportunity for those here illegally and core religious values; for Russian Jewish immigrants who have an instinctive fear of big government and any specter of socialism; and in a surprisingly robust Bulgarian community that hasn’t yet developed an investment in American politics. Immigrants from the former Soviet Union, many of whom only recently reached voting age, often express a visceral allegiance to former Republican President Ronald Reagan for his role in the fall of the Iron Curtain, that carries over as party loyalty for the GOP. 

U.S. immigrants are not a bloc, much less a voting bloc. For immigrants, politics is often a home-grown tradition. Dual citizenship is a convenience and a fact of life in the United States. With every election, both here and back home, many immigrants have options. 

For Lithuanians, for instance, it can get complicated. Younger Lithuanians – those who emigrated after 1990 and became U.S. citizens – can’t vote in Lithuania. Older Lithuanians can vote in both places. Mexican officials were paying attention to the 10 million voting-age Mexicans living in the United States. Though about three-quarters of Mexican immigrants in the U.S. lack U.S. citizenship and can’t vote here, Mexico honors dual citizenship and some 60,000 applied for absentee ballots to vote in the Mexican elections this year. They tend to vote in neither, in part because of a distrust in authorities and the election process, bred in Mexico and reinforced in their new home

That has been the case among Pakistani Americans, too. However, upcoming elections in Pakistan have created quite a buzz among Pakistani immigrants living in the United States, who earlier this year were given voting rights for the first time. The campaign of Imran Khan, a cricket star-turned-politician has galvanized young Pakistani-Americans well beyond anything American elections have been able to do. 

“A nation of immigrants” is a term steeped in the rhetoric of American politics, often invoked to harken back to bygone times, and to remind us of our country’s humanity. 


With 40 million immigrants, legal and illegal, being courted to vote and being kept from voting, this should be an election cycle worth engaging in.

#####

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Immigrants don't fall in line for 2012 elections

                                                                                                                                                    Jack Doppelt

June 20, 2012

[A version of this article was published as Immigrants don't fall in line for 2012 elections on Immigrant Connect]

With President Obama's executive order protecting certain children of illegal immigrants from deportation, and Republicans countering that the announcement is a political ploy, immigration has wedged its way into the 2012 election cycle. And with it has come some misleading shorthand; that immigrants vote Democratic and that immigrants means Latinos. The immigrant landscape is far more nuanced than that, and so is its politics. 
Among what we discovered are stories of: 
  • traditionally Democratic strongholds veering away from supporting President Obama - in the Indian community that has become wealthier and a natural reservoir for political fundraising; 
  • among Poles who face a quandary between an opportunity for those here illegally and core religious values; 
  • for Russian Jewish immigrants who have a visceral fear of big government and any specter of socialism; and in a surprisingly robust Bulgarian community that hasn't yet developed an investment in American politics; 
  • a Pakistani community that is mobilizing for upcoming elections but behind a charismatic political figure back home; 
[Archived documents from first-wave
Lithuanian immigrants that are currently
on display at the Lithuanian Research 
and 
 Studies Center in Chicago (Photo by Jen Lazuta)] 
  • some less publicized factors for low voter participation among Chicago's Latinos
  • some voting complications arising from dual citizenship within the Lithuanian community; 
  • benefits of US citizenship for Arab immigrants and refugees that go well beyond voting; 
  • movement in the Filipino community toward concrete political involvement; 
  • how a state legislative issue has galvanized the Korean community; 
  • and how African immigrants, from multiple nations are turning to community organizations to give voice to their issues here and back home. 
[Community organizer James Thindwa addresses 
the Chicago African Summit crowd. Photo credit: Sarah Travis]

Twelve ethnic media outlets collaborated on the project. They are Africa Today, Al Moustaqbal Future newspaper (Arab), Bulgaria Weekly, Draugas (Lithuanian), Extra (Hispanic), India Tribune, InformacjeUSA.com (Polish), Korea Daily News, Pinoy Newsmagazine (Filipino), Reflejos (Hispanic), Reklama (Russian), and Urdu Times (Pakistani). 
Read the stories here: 

As Indian Americans are becoming one of the nation's wealthiest immigrant groups, many within the community are shifting party alliance from the Democratic to Republican party. And although Indian Americans are relatively few in number, they find they can affect political change through fundraising. 

As the 2012 presidential election approaches, the overwhelmingly Catholic Polish immigrant community in Chicago faces a dilemma: should they vote for Barack Obama, who supports a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants? Or should they allow their religion to inform their decision, and vote Republican based on that party's conservative stances on social issues? 

A recent national trend among Russian immigrant voters shows more and more Jewish Russian immigrants are voting Republican because of a dislike of big government and an affinity for capitalism. 

Like many other Eastern European immigrants, the Bulgarian community is leaning Republican as the 2012 election campaign takes shape. 

With the burgeoning involvement in politics not just in America, but also in Pakistan, second and third generation Pakistani-Americans are laying claim to their rights both as American citizens and Pakistani descents. 

"The Latino Vote" is one of the most coveted of the 2012 election. But, for many Latinos living in Chicago, the question is not where their vote will go, but if they cast one at all. Underneath the hectic work-schedules and struggles of all minority communities is a distrust among Latinos in the American electoral system; a combination of the corruption back home and disenchantment with the perceived "political machine" in Chicago. 

The Lithuanian constitution, which distinguishes immigrant citizenship rights based on year of arrival, has caused a generational voting debate among those who came to the U.S. before 1990 and those who came after. 

Future American citizenship provides Arab immigrants and political organizations with more political clout and opportunity at home and abroad. 

Historically Filipinos have been less politically active than other immigrant groups in Chicago due to corrupt politics in their home country and a colonial mentality that remains a part of many Filipinos' psychological mindset. Jessica O'Brien may be proof that this trend is reversing with second-generation Filipino immigrants. 

The Illinois state legislature was in the process of banning PERC, a very harmful chemical that is important to the dry cleaning process, before the Korean American Dry Cleaners Association of Illinois and others stepped in. The resulting amendment to House Bill 4526 was due to negotiation, and may be the catalyst in creating a stronger Korean presence in the political system. 

As the national 2012 elections draw nearer, African immigrants continue to focus on politics at home, rather than in the states. Immigrants are turning instead to local elections and community organizations to give voice to their issues. 

 The stories were released in June 2012. 

#####