Wednesday, January 13, 2021

For courage and leadership, I take Twitter over politicians

Jack Doppelt 
 Jan. 9, 2021 

Everyone knows of Donald Trump's complicity in the storming of the Capitol on Wednesday. We may need to leave the question to courts and legal debates whether it is legally sufficient to constitute criminal incitement to imminent lawless action. Trump says it was “totally appropriate.” 

 If we want clarity and accountability, Twitter is a far better lodestar than politicians from either of the two parties. 

Twitter permanently suspended Trump's account Jan 8. It had 88.7 million followers. 



Other social media sites and platforms piled on in various iterations. All are being roundly criticized, particularly from the right flank, for squelching speech and singling out Trump. 

In the blog post justifying its action, Twitter accounted the reasons. 

Twitter took away Trump's privileges permanently and immediately. Immediately because his posts risk further incitement of violence. 

Twitter concluded that two of his recent tweets read together make it dangerously clear that he was speaking directly to the 75 million American Patriots who voted for him and who "will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future." He told them he was not going to the Inauguration on Jan. 20. 

Twitter invoked its published policy dating back to 2019 that bans the Glorification of Violence because the tweets could inspire others to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol.

When promulgated in 2019, the policy, in conjunction with related policies, was directed specifically at the actions of world leaders. The policies explained that Twitter will err on the side of leaving content up if there is a clear public interest in doing so to provide "a place where people can openly and publicly respond to their leaders and hold them accountable." The policies were focused on public officials who have more than 100,000 followers. 

Twitter did its homework in concluding from Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the inauguration is being received by supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and that he was disavowing his previous claim of an “orderly transition” on Inauguration Day that was tweeted by one of his deputy chiefs of staff. 

Twitter was concerned that the tweets "may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a 'safe' target, as he will not be attending, and that the use of the words “American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those who committed violent acts at the US Capitol. 

Being attuned to dog whistles, Twitter concluded that Trump "plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election." 

Twitter advised that most menacingly, "plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on Jan. 17." 

It didn't help that Trump posted a video in the throes of the Capitol chaos that in telling his overzealous supporters to go home, he reinforced that the election was fraudulent, that it was stolen, that he won in a landslide, that "we can't play into the hands of these people," and that "we love you. You're very special." 

Twitter's decision on Trump's account was decisive, reasoned, immediate and permanent. 

That can't be said for our politicians, Republicans or Democrats. 

There are far too many Republicans for us to live in a civilized democracy who continue to publicly espouse the conviction that the election was stolen, that Trump won, and that Biden is not lawfully president. All are fire kindling, reporting for duty. 

They can be grouped by clusters of pretexts, with mouthpieces for each: 

• The Dems illegitimized Trump's presidency even before his Inauguration. They started it and this is payback. In convening a news conference after the election, on Nov. 20, to tout Trump's handling of the covid pandemic, his press secretary Kayleig McEnany said: "Trump was never given an orderly transition of power. His presidency was never accepted." During the current House debates, Cong. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), whom Trump rewarded with a Presidential Medal of Freedom, referred triumphantly to the session in 2017 that certified Trump’s election, railing against the hypocrisy of Democrats for complaining about GOP attempts to undermine Biden’s presidency now. Jordan continues to claim falsely he’s free from any culpability in formenting Trumpers to believe the election was stolen. Yet the attempt to challenge the certification of Trump's electoral win in Jan. 2017 was thwarted before it started by then-Vice President Biden who chaired the joint session. 



[Click on the photo to see and hear Biden during that session tell objecting House Democrats that “it’s over.”] That’s the same procedural session that 14 GOP Senators and 121 GOP members of the House set out to stop last week, and almost did with the timely actions of fomented insurrectionists. 

There's little doubt that the Democrats and thousands of others gave Trump little chance to govern without entrenched, vocal opposition, not because they challenged the legitimacy of his 2016 election but because of the draconian decisions he made, the executive orders he imposed, and the inhumane agenda he set out within his first hundred days in office. Minority leader Schumer referred to it then as “incompetence leading to chaos.” Meekly deferential, if you ask me. I wrote a piece then that appealed to Senate Republicans to give Trump a probationary year before holding a hearing on the first Supreme Court vacancy in his term to ensure that he's not impeached by then. 

• Only a handful of rioters breached the Capitol, and who says they were Trump supporters and not disguised Antifa anarchists, the all-encompassing shorthand the right uses for left-leaning protesters? Rudy Giuliani urged the agitated crowd before the Capitol onslaught to "have trial by combat” of the lawmakers about to vote to certify Biden as president. And on a podcast that has already been removed by YouTube, Giuliani said later that Antifa forces were to blame. "Believe me, Trump people were not scaling the wall. So there's nothing to it that he incited anything…And there's equal if not more responsibility on the fascists who run the Democrat Party.” 

 • The refusals to certify Biden's presidency are acts needed to memorialize bona fide objections to the election thefts in the key swing states. The Rule of Law Defense Fund, a fundraising arm of the Republican Attorneys General Association, sent out robocalls the day before the Capitol storming, encouraging people to march to the Capitol and call on Congress to stop the steal." [click on the link to listen to the robocall, as published by the watchdog group, Documented.] For weeks after the election, GOP lawmakers supported Trump's incessant claims of rampant election fraud, citing the American principle that everyone should have a chance to challenge elections in court and through recounts. After the courts and election officials ruled one by one without exception that there was no credible evidence of fraud or mis-counts, a different strategy emerged. GOP Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) seized onto the idea that one more avenue was paved for Trump’s grievances. He issued a statement in the name of the Conservative Action Project to protect the Republic on behalf of 21 named conservatives and the more than 50 million American voters “who believe the election was stolen or somehow illegitimate,” and called on the Senate to continue to contest the electoral votes from five swing states. He noted that substantial evidence has been presented to courts and state legislatures. Yet not one court, state legislature or election body found the evidence worthy of denying Biden’s certification. Three days later, his Senate colleague Ted Cruz (R-Texas) seized onto a legal strategy he was convinced would do the trick of postponing the certification of Biden for 10 days. He issued a statement with 12 other GOP Senators calling for postponement because the election “featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.” Cruz manufactured the illusion, knowing it to be the same flat lie that Hawley was propagating. “Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud.” That is precisely what courts and election officials spent weeks doing - hearing evidence and resolving all the allegations. Cruz’s home newspaper, the non-partisan, nonprofit Texas Tribune reported on the release of the statement as continuing to pursue unsubstantiated claims of a widespread voter fraud in "disputed states," despite no evidence of fraud

 • Trump's supporters are understandably frustrated by the rampant election fraud, and attempts to demonize or prosecute them will only deepen their justifiable frustrations. A base of 74 million people voted for Trump, and a month after the election, the Washington Times claimed that Fox News analyzed a poll that concluded that 68% of Republicans believe the election was stolen from Trump and that among Trump voters, 77% think he actually won. Lindsey Graham (R-S. Car.), Trump's friend when he chooses to be, ultimately decided not to contest Biden's certification. Two days later, he was greeted with shouts of "traitor" in a chance encounter at a Washington, DC airport. The tweet that has attracted more than 11 million visits shows a crowd yelling, "you know it was rigged." The shrill appeals were to AUDIT OUR VOTE. Those were tame recriminations compared to the "Hang Pence" chants leveled at the vice-president who had traded in his resolute support for Trump's stolen election conspiracy for a statement released the morning of the Capitol insurrection, that he could not stop the certification. True patriots are cowards to allow a rigged election without a fight. 

• This has gone too far and the country must be taken back from the election fraudsters, socialists, and dangerous Democrats by true American patriots like those who secured independence from Britain. Derrick Evans, a newly elected GOP legislator from West Virginia, who live streamed himself among those storming the Capitol, yelled, "We're taking this country back whether you like it or not. Today's a test run. We're taking this country back." Though he has since resigned, his grandmother selected Twitter to thank Trump for “invoking a riot at the White House.” [click to appreciate her heartfelt thanks] 

Each of the pretexts shares an entrenched, chilling and festering mythology that the election was stolen from Trump. The fervent beliefs reject the decisions of more than 50 courts, both state and federal, many composed of Trump-chosen and Republican judges, including the Supreme Court. They choose to overlook the inability of Trump's lawyers to produce any verifiable evidence of election fraud in any states. Instead, they choose to believe the election was stolen and Trump is the lawful keeper of the throne.

Can you blame thousands upon thousands of people for getting engulfed in a fire that is destined to spread with dry GOP kindling fueling it, with juntas of law enforcement embedded throughout the country, and with right-wing media outlets serving as accelerants? 

The Democrats are of course a horse of a different color. They can be clustered by the actions they are intent on taking now to make sure people don't conclude that Trump's actions are without consequences. Though Democrats don’t admit it publicly or have themselves become self-deluding, each action is symbolic, won’t stop or deter Trump from whatever he chooses to do before Jan. 20, and don’t seem to account for the legions of duped Trumpers who believe to the core that Biden isn’t a legitimate president. 

• Resignation – In recalling the successful attempts by Republicans in 1974 to cajole Richard Nixon to resign, Democrats tried to convince themselves that Trump has a similar incentive to do so. Resign and have Pence pardon him. Have they just met Donald Trump? He will not go quietly into that good night, as poet Dylan Thomas wrote. “Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying if the light. The man is the ultimate rager.

• 25th Amendment - The House introduced a resolution calling on Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment and vote with Trump’s cabinet to declare Trump unable to perform his duties. Trump has an opportunity first to declare he’s fine, thank you. The House will then give Pence 24 hours to decide with a majority of the cabinet that Trump is not fine. If they do, 2/3 of both houses also have to vote that Trump is unable to discharge his duties. Pence has stated publicly that he’s not game. Other than the actual existence of a 25th Amendment, this Democratic option reads either as a bad joke with no punchline or as the tantrums of a frustrated party that has tried and failed at every turn to suffocate Trump’s presidency. The two-year Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, and the first impeachment that culminated in Trumps’ acquittal in the Senate backfired badly. They energized Trump’s base, galvanized his fundraising, spiked his poll approval ratings, and set the stage for him to attract 74 million votes and almost win a second term in office. 

 • Impeachment – The House drafted one Article of Impeachment for “incitement of insurrection” and approved it by a mostly partisan vote of 232-197Trump’s phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State, the audio of which is recorded, that tried to get Brad Raffensperger to “find’ the votes that would boost Trump’s total over Biden’s wasn’t included in the article. Before the debate itself, the issue seemed to be fixed on whether an impeachment can be fast-tracked and resolved before Inauguration Day or if this second impeachment will encroach on Biden’s agenda as he opens his term in office. Now that it's been voted up by the House with all deliberate speed, outgoing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has stated definitely that the earliest possible it can be considered on the Senate floor is Inauguration Day. It’s not, but he’ll make it be, even though at one point, he told associates that he believes Trump has committed impeachable offenses and he’s pleased the Democrats are following through on summary impeachment proceedings. 

The Democrats should overcome their frustrations and get on with the buildup to Biden’s presidency. Of course they’re frustrated, as Trump has said of his patriots. Frustration isn’t in short supply and it’s become a dangerous emotion.

In the short run, the sublimely fortunate short run, Trump has the Democrats outmaneuvered again. He is a master conman who has spent his life perfecting the con on bankers, foreign investors, his extended family and the IRS before strutting down the escalator with Melania and a thumb up in 2015 to open the game of using the presidency to con the public, the news media and Republicans who early on considered him to be “a malignant cow” [former Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.)], "unsound, uninformed, unhinged and unfit" [former GOP Gov. Tim Pawlenty from Minn.)], "a con artist (who) is about to take over the Republican Party and the conservative movement and we have to put a stop to it," [Sen. Mark Rubio (R-FL)], "a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot” [Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S. Car.)], and “the distraction.” [Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah)] 

Take heed. Biden is president, two corrupt incumbent GOP Senators from Georgia have been defeated by two first-time Democratic challengers, and the Senate will no long be strangled by McConnell and his obstructionist GOP colleagues. Getting on with it is not communicating that Trump’s action have no consequences. 

Yes, there’s plenty Trump can and will do in the week he remains president. I expect he will issue 11th hour pardons to his most loyal associates, his entire family, himself and the patriots who honored him at the barricades. He may do more. If he does or doesn’t, Trump has set himself up to be prosecuted in multiple locations in the country. If he can pardon himself at all, it’s only for federal crimes. 

My concerns are about his legacy, as I noted above: 

• the juntas of law enforcement among the ranks of ICE, Homeland Security, sheriff’s offices, police unions and now Capitol police who are embedded throughout the country. Fortunately his efforts to recruit the military and the FBI failed. 
• right-wing media outlets that are spreading like kudzu on television, radio and social media. 
• the thousands of people who are building up a fierce resentment and distrust of Biden’s presidency, of science (during a pandemic), and of reliable information. 

 We have Twitter at least to thank for gumming up Trump’s works.

https://www.facebook.com/jack.doppelt/posts/10159268608171098



#####


Thursday, January 7, 2021

Dear Sen. Ted

Jack Doppelt

Jan. 6, 2021

The Honorable Ignominious Raphael Edward Cruz
US Capitol Still Standing

Dear Sen. Ted--

I am writing to let you know how I'm doing and to thank you for for providing me with a week of calm. When you told Maria Bartiromo and Fox News last Sunday of your plans to mobilize GOP congressional colleagues to object to President-elect Biden's convincing electoral victory, you advised the rest of us "to calm down," adding that "this is already a volatile situation."

Democrats, the news media and I calmed down. We had a peaceful, even jubilant, few days as our attention fixed on Georgia, where two novice Democratic candidates defeated two well-known GOP incumbents for the U.S. Senate where you work.

Looking back, I needed those few days of respite to gird myself for yesterday's surreal, yet predictable, assault on the U.S. Capitol. The nation is already experiencing post-traumatic convulsions, trying to determine if the better characterization of the events is a failed coup, an insurrection, mob violence, a garden-variety riot, or a lawful protest run amok. Words matter as you have so sagely noted.

How to characterize it and attempt to move forward might depend to some extent on whether it was premeditated by people who seized the opportunity to terrorize the American people and subvert democracy, or whether it was in eruption of pent up anger stoked by an ingrained belief that the 2020 presidential election was rigged and that Biden should not be recognized as the lawfully elected president.

Both were foreseeable and both were fanned by President Trump when he exhorted the crowd at his "Save America" rally to march in solidarity with him from the mall to Capitol Hill to "fight like hell" or they won't have a country anymore and to give your weak congressional colleagues "the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country."

Trump chose not to march as thousands of his patriots streamed into the march and met at Capitol Hill.

The Sunday before, after the solemnity of oath takings for your newly elected congressional colleagues,  many told their families to go home. They felt the earth moving under foot.

Recognizing your prowess as a constitutional scholar whose bedrock beliefs of limited federal powers go all the way back to high school, I wouldn't think of taking on the hornet's nest of arguing whether Trump's crowd fulminations were an incitement to imminent lawless action that should be prosecuted.

There is enough blame to go around and to deny with righteous detachment.

Click on the photo to watch the CNN Politics video

Your House counterpart, the estimable contemptible Louis Gohmert told Newsmax, an ultra-conservative mouthpiece, that the effect of one of the many court rulings that unsuccessfully challenged Biden's legitimacy as president-elect was that, in effect, it means that "you got to go to the streets and be as violent as Antifa and [Black Lives Matter.]"


As the statement emphasized: "The 2020 election featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud,  violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities." It invoked a Reuters/Ipsos poll and you directed attention to these numbers: 39% of Americans believe "the election was rigged." 67% of Republicans, 17% of Democrats and 31% of Independents believe it.

Those are curious numbers to cite when the summary of the poll itself reported that 3/4 of Americans (73%) believe that Biden won the election based on what they know or have heard. 5% believe Trump won. When asked who rightfully won the election, 63% of Americans believe Biden has, including 95% of Democrats, 29% of Republicans, and 60% of Independents. Only 20% of Americans agree that Trump, who has also claimed victory, is acting responsibly in doing so. Seven out of ten (69%) think he is acting irresponsibly. Your emphasis and that of your dozen colleagues who signed on is a textbook illustration of the abuse of statistics, cherry picked to indicate the opposite of reality.

Why do that? So you and your GOP colleagues could argue, as you did, that the "deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear."

Apparently the deep distrust that you manufactured, though decidedly among Republicans, would have a better chance of disappearing if people indulged in the need to not certify Biden's victory.

Your home newspaper, the non-partisan, nonprofit Texas Tribune reported on the release of the statement as continuing to pursue unsubstantiated claims of a widespread voter fraud in "disputed states," despite no evidence of fraud.

As a master debater, you are an impressively persuasive fellow. The Texas Tribune reported yesterday that after the assault on Congress, though both houses of Congress voted overwhelmingly to certify Biden's election, most GOP house members from Texas voted with you.

To leave you with an indelible sense of what your persuasiveness has added to Trump's exhortations, Ashli Babbitt has a cautionary epitaph you might learn from. Babbitt is the woman who was shot and killed during the storming of the Capitol. The day before she died, she tweeted under her handle Common Sense Ash, "Nothing will stop us… they can try and try and try but the storm is here and it is descending upon DC in less than 24 hours...dark to light."

She declared Jan. 6 as the day Republicans "start winning." You felt the same. In your scenario, Jan. 6 was to be when Congress would side with you and decline to certify Biden as president.

[Read on Facebook]
#####







Wednesday, January 6, 2021

Watching Fox News so you don't have to

Jack Doppelt
Jan. 6, 2021

I'm watching Fox News today as the results of the Georgia Senate runoffs settle in, as Congress meets to certify the electoral collage votes while a moronic Republican strain performs its challenge to Biden's election, and as protesters in DC gather to pump up Trump and his GOP sycophants in Congress.

I'm doing it to get a more visceral sense of the national divide as we move into a new era. You may not be  surprised by what you read, but you'll have details that will underscore the complexities of the road ahead.

---------------------------------

In speaking to the hordes in DC, Donald Trump, Jr. tried to jazz the crowd by punctuating something he said with "Amen." He followed with "A woman." Too cute apparently. He was loudly booed and tried to be quick on his feet by turning it around, saying that's how the Democrats would say it.

Right at 11 am Chicago time, Trump began his oration for his "Save America" rally. He opened by slamming the media, challenging them to show the hundreds of thousands of people who are there. On Fox News, they turned the cameras around and focused narrowly on the crowd. Viewers couldn't tell if there were dozens or hundreds or thousands in the crowd. Trump looked out, shielding his eyes from the sun and envisioned the crowd stretching beyond the Washington Monument. Maybe so. He's not one to be trusted on such matters.

He pledged to stop the steal. He boasted that he won the election in both 2016 and 2020. In 2020, he won by even more. A landslide. Does anybody believe that Biden had 80 million votes?  A resounding, no. He complained that the military should be allowed to come up on the stage with him. He's counting on Pence to do the right thing - to make sure that the states should have to re-certify, then he'd be president. He rambled and got the crowd to chant almost at will for a while. He went after the weak Republicans - Romney, McConnell, Georgia Gov. Kemp, Liz Cheney, and any others who don't support the day's agenda to trash the electoral college voting.

[It was during this part of the rant that word leaked out that Biden is nominating Merrick Garland to be the Attorney General. Garland was the judge whom then-President Obama nominated for the Supreme Court to fill the vacancy left by Justice Scalia's death in 2016.]

Trump called on the crowd to march peacefully with him to the Capitol.

The chanting exploded when he called the late night voting results from state-to-state "bullshit." That got the crowd going. The chanting turned to "bullshit, bullshit." When he beseeched the crowd to applaud for Perdue and Loeffler, there was scant applauding. He tried to get the crowd to hoot and howl because he fought for increasing the covid relief package from $600 to $2,000. "Give em a couple of bucks," he said proudly. The crowd didn't go for it.

Where's Hillary? Later, where's Hunter? Not much response to either of those natural rousers.

Some of his preaching did hit the mark with the crowd. Mike Pence has to send the electoral college results back. The crowd came alive again. The chants rang out. "Send it back." Even "get rid of section 230" got some payback.

He warned the crowd he was going to lay out the case for fraud, and they don't mind staying on to listen, right? Murmurs at best. He asked again later. A handful of people responded. Some signaling yes; others no.

He was noticing that he was losing his people. It was hard to not see a crowd of people who were being held hostage in the cold. They had to stay on for the solidarity march to the Capitol. 

As a standup performer, riffing around his notes, he can tell when a crowd is abandoning him. The trick for him at this point is to sense what will get them back. A few attempts took. Most didn't. What he was doing was warming up the crowd.

As he appeared to be moving toward an end, bemoaning that he could go on for hours regaling them with the unprecedented fraud, the crowd gave him the adoration he needed. "We love you," they chanted. He had another half hour in him, which he continued to use to foment the crowd about the illegitimacy of the Biden presidency.

[One hour after Trump opened his "Save America" rally, Congress convened in joint session. Vice President Pence reminded the congresspeople that debate will not be allowed in the session. The limited role of the session, he announced, is for both houses to verify that the certificates of the counts in the states are authentic and appropriate in form. They proceeded through the count state by state in alphabetical order.]

Fox News continued with Trump live, and the congressional session in an adjoining screen with the sound off. Fox News advised its audience that they will switch to the audio in Congress when the roll call gets to Arizona to show the objection to the Arizona electoral count. They did and Pence announced that the two houses will adjourn into separate sessions to debate the Arizona vote. Fox stayed with coverage of the congressional setting. When the session recessed, Fox News introduced a panel to debrief on it. Before they went to the panel, one of the Fox announcers underscored that Pence was standing loyally behind the president now and has at every turn. Another Fox announcer intervened to add that Pence issued a letter to Congress, indicating that he wasn't go to follow Trump's line in the sand.

I had no idea at this point if Trump was aware during the rally of the Garland nomination or of Pence's apparent shift in position to limiting his role and doing it against Trump's wishes.

Fox News would not return to the audio of Trump's rally. Their coverage would stay with the affairs of Congress. At one point, they showed in an adjoining screen the Trump rally moving to the hill and reported that in some cases, trying unsuccessfully to get into Congress.

As the GOP faction of Trumpers were making their case in both houses simultaneously, in the Senate, Mitch McConnell staked out a clear yet unexpected position that the election wasn't even close that it isn't Congress' role to nullify the votes of the electoral majority - of some 80 million people, of the states and of the many courts that have concluded that the voting was lawful. He reinforced that with all the objections to the elections state-by-state, the Trump forces have not managed to provide any evidence of fraud. He described the move by the small fraction of GOP Trumpers as pushing democracy into a "death spiral."

When Ted Cruz spoke in the Senate, he argued for an electoral commission to investigate for ten days the legitimacy of the elections in the swing states. He repeated his contention that half the country, not just Republicans, believe that the presidential election was rife with fraud. His point was that the public needs to be reassured that there was no fraud that would have changed the results. 

Not for a moment did he consider the obvious indisputable truth. The huge numbers of the public, probably millions, who believe that the presidential election was rife with fraud believe it not based on any evidence but on the barrages of disinformation propagated by Trump, fellow Republicans, Fox News and their companions in the far right media. There is no guarantee, not even a likelihood, that Trump's band of miscreants will change their tunes or give up the ghost. As Trump put it before the rally ended, "We will never give up, we will never concede."

Shortly after Cruz spoke, all hell broke loose, or more accurately, all hell broke in. The crowd that seemed to swell off camera on the way from the mall to the hill had breached the meager law enforcement presence at the gates, entered the halls of Congress and begun strutting down the halls. Congress halted the proceedings and took cover. 

All hell had broken in.

[Read on Facebook]

                                                               #####


Tuesday, December 15, 2020

The blog begins

                                      Jack Doppelt
Dec. 15, 2020

I'm starting today to archive my writings, commentaries, and musings going back to college during the 1970s. I'll upload as I go, so for awhile, it will be randomly fed. You can watch it go up, as you might with a high rise in downtown Evanston or a Jeanne Gang building in Chicago.

Jeanne Gang's Aqua Tower

Thursday, December 3, 2020

Fountain of Yahoo

                                                                                                             Jack Doppelt

Dec. 3, 2020

The Fountain of Youth may be a mythical spring that restores the youth of anyone who drinks or bathes in it.
“Drinking the kool-aid” may be a grotesque reference that reminds us of the 900 people who died in Jonestown, Guyana in 1978 when Jim Jones, the cult leader of the Peoples Temple movement turned on his followers and on a congressman who visited to investigate the settlement that was preying on Americans.
We are now in the throes of the unseemly phenomenon of millions of Americans drinking with blind faith from the Fountain of Yahoo. They are the sympathizers of Donald Trump who in the month since the Nov. 3 election has stepped up his fundraising campaign that is driven by the need for him to play into the stoked beliefs that he was elected President and has been defrauded of his rightful place as the incumbent winner. To bilk as much as he can out of these believers, one surefire way is to prolong his unremitting conga line of lawsuits.
Within two weeks of the election, Trump and his henchmen hatched the coordinated plan that seamlessly converted his official campaign site into the Official Election Defense Fund. Go to the campaign site, click to donate and it takes you and others thirsting to support to the defense fund site, which in only a couple of weeks has raised more than $170 million, far more than his campaign did over any similar period before the election. Now he’s being victimized. As his claims of election fraud become more insistent, they are debunked by anyone with a shred of dignity or a grip on reality.
It only matters that the blindly faithful cling to his visions of grandeur. In one interview after another, the small-dollar donors are fine with the idea that their contributions don’t go toward recounts or legal expenses to challenge the election results. They’re fine in being told not one of the lawsuits has succeeded. Their blind faith is reinforced by Republican officials at the highest levels and by Fox News and other conservative outlets. They assert his victory being snatched from him with the same apparent certainty and indignation as Trump. If 75% of each contribution goes to Trump’s future or into his pockets, no matter what he chooses to do with it, so be it. They trust him to do what’s best.
The “drinking the kool-aid” reference is a harsh reminder, often used lightly. When Trump was interviewed by Bob Woodward for his book Rage, Trump's reaction to his question about the responsibility of white, privileged people to help understand the motivations of Black Lives Matter protesters, Trump said: "You really drank the Kool-Aid, didn't you?”
I hope fervently that Donald Trump’s careless use of his presidential and charismatic powers of persuasion will not result in anything unthinkable from some of his sympathizers acting in his name. Many well-meaning people dread the possibility.
I prefer at this juncture to caution people to not drink from the Fountain of Yahoo he’s offering.
Yahoo, aside from being a social media provider, is a word that conjures the image of a rude person, or as used originally in Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver's Travels, a book many of us read in school, a Yahoo is a primitive creature obsessed with digging in the mud whom Swift invoked to represent distasteful materialism and ignorant elitism.
Stay clear of the fountain.

#####

Friday, November 6, 2020

Iowa disappoints big time in 2020

   Jack Doppelt


Iowa voters successfully penetrated the GOP-controlled legislature’s persistent efforts to suppress the vote, but to little end in holding the GOP responsible. A record number of Iowans – 1.7 million – voted. That’s 78.6% of all eligible voters, 3rd in the nation behind only Maine and Minnesota. Nearly 1 million voted early. Another 700,000 voted on election day.



Still, Iowa raised the red GOP banner almost across the board -the Presidency, US Senate, two of four US Congressional seats (with a 3rd too close to call), and both houses of the Iowa legislature. 97 of Iowa’s 99 counties are now represented by a Republican in either the state House or Senate.

       Thanks all for your work, efforts, and spirit. https://bit.ly/3n0mzDy

#####

Tuesday, November 3, 2020

Election day - it's in Iowans' hands now

   Jack Doppelt


Election day. The finish line looms. Iowa takes 2,095,581 registered voters, the most ever, into today's election potential. Almost 1 million have already voted. Another million are in position to vote today. Final call.

Since the primaries in June, Republican registrations have climbed faster than, and surpassed, Democratic registrations. Independent registrations went down before the primaries because unaffiliateds can’t vote in the primaries.

That's where things stand, polls aside.



#####